The Writers Precinct
Bulletin · Author Scam Watch

Flattery about your book will get you... scammed.

A "publishing house" that contacts you out of the blue, pay-to-play book clubs, fake radio invites, marketers with three names, "famous authors" in your DMs. Writers get hit with these every week. We log them here, break down how each con works, and show you the tell so you can spot the next one.

Run by a former law enforcement officer turned author, tracking these cons since 2023. We show the con and the sending address, never the real people being impersonated.

Before you reply to anyone

Three questions that break almost every scam

01 "Is this free, or is there a cost anywhere?"

Watch for "the feature is free, the only cost is..." That's a cost.

02 "How many people, and how do you verify them?"

One "club" claiming thousands of members admitted to 80 when we asked.

03 "Can I contact a past client myself?"

Real businesses send names. Scams send a discount or go quiet.

The Scam Log

20 cases · book scams first
CASE #011 · START HERENov 5 to 14, 2025 · X DMVERDICT: PAY-TO-PLAY, CONFIRMED ($380)

We played along: the whole book club funnel, start to finish

Claims to be"ShelfTalk Book Club," a monthly reader community
Sent viaX direct message, from an account named "Prime Radio"
The real price$205 teaser video + $175 "presentation designs" = $380 for a "free" feature

The transcript

Left: themRight: us
We're reaching out from ShelfTalk Book Club, a vibrant community of readers who meet each month to share the stories that move and inspire us. Our next gathering is on November 20th, and we'd love to feature you... Would you be open to joining us or sharing a short Q&A for the event?Nov 5
Yes. Is this a free event or pay to play?Nov 8
Thank you for getting back to me! The feature and all promotional placements are completely free, the only cost is for the creative materials that come with it: the book teaser video and presentation designs.Nov 8
I wanted to check in to see if you're still interested in taking the feature spot... We haven't received your materials yet, and we're finalizing our schedule soon... we may need to release the spot if we don't hear back shortly.Nov 9 · deadline on a spot we never accepted
sure share some samples and give me the prices. I make a lot of visuals myself so my standards are high.Nov 9
The book teaser is $205, a 50-60 second cinematic-style video that highlights your book. The book presentation design is $175 and includes four standout designs...Nov 9 · plus sample graphics made for other authors' books
I'm already using book brush for my ads and they are pretty cool. I'll think about the video.Nov 9
For our feature, the teaser video and presentation designs are actually part of how we introduce your book to our readers and community, so they're created specifically for the ShelfTalk spotlight.Nov 10 · 1:21 AM · translation: not optional
How many people are in your network and how did you verify them?Nov 10
We currently have about 80-90 members in our network. All our members are verified through our virtual meetings and ongoing engagements...Nov 10
Hello, How are you doing?Nov 14 · 2:21 AM, after we went quiet

The tells

  • The account name doesn't match the club. "Prime Radio" pitching for "ShelfTalk."
  • "Free" with a mandatory $380 attached is not free.
  • Deadline pressure on a spot you never accepted.
  • Replies at 1:21 AM and 2:21 AM Pacific.
  • Pushed on numbers, the audience shrank to under 100 people, with no way to check even that. Compare the 1,300 and 2,205 members claimed in Cases #003 and #005.
Why this case mattersThis is where Cases #002, #003, #005 and #007 lead if you reply. The "feature" is the bait, the design package is the product, and the club is a few dozen people at best. Two questions exposed it fast: "Is this free?" and "How many members, and how do you verify them?" Ask both, every time.

We don't show their sample graphics. Those were made for other authors' books, and those authors are likely victims, not scammers.

CASE #003Oct 19, 2026 · EmailVERDICT: PAY-TO-PLAY

The book club that actually read your blurb

Claims to be"Jay Binder," organizer of "A Different Type of Book Club, Arlington," said to have 1,300+ members
Sent fromjay.adlfferentypeofbookclub@gmail.com
The pitchAn "Author Spotlight": reader gathering plus a virtual Q&A built around your book

The tells

  • This one names the book and quotes its themes. Don't let that sell you. Every detail matches what's on a public book listing, and AI can turn a blurb into flattering "we read it" copy in seconds.
  • Look closely at the address: "adlfferent" with a lowercase L where the i should be. A lookalike spelling on a free Gmail account.
  • "The associated support contribution." That's a fee with a nicer name.
  • Big member count, a city name, and nothing you can check: no website, no meetup page, no venue.
  • It asks if you're "open to receiving an overview." Say yes and the price list arrives.
Why this one mattersIt's the polished version of Case #002. Same club script, but personalized to your actual book so it gets past your guard. Real book clubs pick books because members want to read them. They don't charge the author to be picked.
CASE #005Sep 22, 2026 · EmailVERDICT: PAY-TO-PLAY BAIT

The Paris "Author Spotlight"

Claims to be"Farouk Rivelli," organizer of Paris Social Circle, said to have 2,205+ members
Sent fromparissocialcircle@gmail.com
The pitchA "relaxed online author conversation" for the club's readers

The tells

  • "Author Spotlight" again. Same name as Case #003's Arlington club, same "would you be open to me sending the details?" close. Different city, same script.
  • It mentions the author's background and website, all from a public bio. Flattery built from an About page, not from reading the book.
  • A suspiciously precise member count (2,205+) with no way to check it.
  • A Paris club that meets online, run from Gmail.
  • Signature says "Organizers" under one person's name, with a polished headshot. Run photos like that through a reverse image search; scam profiles often borrow stock or stolen pictures.
What usually comes next"The details" turn out to be a spotlight package with a fee attached. Real reading groups don't need you to agree to receive details before telling you what they are.
CASE #002Oct 18, 2026 · EmailVERDICT: PAY-TO-PLAY, CONFIRMED

The "exclusive" book club evening

Claims to be"Books & Bites" event manager, signed "Joshua"
Sent frombookandbiteseventmanager@gmail.com
The pitchYour book "introduced" to 300 to 400 guests at a cozy dinner event

The tells

  • Greets you by the front half of your email address. Scraped, not researched.
  • "A great book" with no title. They have no idea what you wrote.
  • No city, no venue, no date. A real 300-guest event has all three.
  • First name only, no website, no phone, no social links.
  • Ends on a soft hook: "I'd love to share more." The details come later, with a price.
What usually comes nextOther authors have published what arrives after they replied to "Books & Bites": a tiered "spotlight package" priced in the hundreds of dollars to have the book featured. Some who declined kept getting follow-ups for weeks.

We see this one constantly under different names: book clubs, reading salons, "exclusive" literary dinners. Same script, new Gmail account.

CASE #001Oct 19, 2026 · EmailVERDICT: IMPERSONATION

Fake public radio interview invite

Claims to beHost of a well-known public radio arts show (KCRW, Los Angeles)
Sent fromhostmadeleine@gmail.com
Real station uses@kcrw.org

The tells

  • Never names your book or any specific work. "Your work" fits every inbox it lands in.
  • Opens with "Hello," and no name. Mass mailing.
  • Pasted template seams, like two sentences jammed together mid-word.
  • The host writes you personally. Real shows send a producer or booker.
  • Gmail address instead of the station's own domain.
  • Sent at 2:17 AM Pacific. Odd hours for a Los Angeles radio show.
What usually comes nextOnce you reply with topics and dates, the follow-up asks for a "booking fee," "production package," or sends you to a PR firm you have to pay. Real public radio never charges guests.

The real host and station have nothing to do with this email. Want to know if an invite is real? Contact the station through its own website, not by replying.

CASE #020Oct 21, 2026 · X DMVERDICT: PAY-TO-PLAY BAIT

The radio show that wants to put you in the newspaper

Claims to be"Anthony Robinson" from the production team at "Ink & Airwaves Radio"
Sent viaX direct message at 3:38 AM Pacific, from an account that "changed their username recently"
The pitchA "Newspaper Spotlight" feature of 7 to 10 pages, plus an "Author Spotlight" radio interview

The tells

  • A radio show selling a newspaper feature. Pick a medium.
  • 7 to 10 pages about one author. No real newspaper gives that kind of space to an author it found on X. That's cover-story length, and it's there to make you feel important.
  • It never names the newspaper. The feature gets "distributed among our member community," which means there may be no newspaper at all.
  • "Author Spotlight" again, the fourth time this phrase has shown up in this log (see Cases #003, #005 and #007).
  • "The available participation details." That's how these messages say "price."
  • No book named. "Selected authors and their literary works" fits anyone.
Ask these two questions"Which newspaper is this running in?" and "Is there any cost to me?" A real outlet names its paper in one line. A scam names a fee, or a paper you can't find anywhere.
CASE #0082026 · Email · Plus 4 follow-upsVERDICT: FAKE IDENTITY, PAID PITCH

The "your book is in freefall" marketer

Claims to be"Rose Perry," Book Marketing Strategist at "Mary Brown Book Marketing"
Sent fromroseperry0852@gmail.com"Website": a free GitHub page at roseperry0852-lab.github.io/Sarah-Perry/
The pitchYour sales are dying; reply "interested" and we'll fix it with ads, categories and "series conversion architecture"

The tells

  • Three names for one person. The email is signed Rose Perry, the agency is Mary Brown, and the website folder says Sarah Perry. Whoever built this didn't keep the story straight.
  • A "marketing agency" on Gmail with a number in the address, hosted on a free GitHub page.
  • The "homework" is two minutes on an Amazon page: launch badge, current rank, review count, star rating, a pulled review quote. All public, all scrapable, now dressed up as a personal audit.
  • Fear first. "Freefall," "dead launch," "nobody's finding it." Make the author feel like they're failing, then sell the rescue.
  • It promises BookBub Featured Deal exposure to hundreds of thousands of readers. BookBub's editors choose those deals; no marketer can guarantee you one.
  • Four follow-ups after no reply. Legit agencies don't chase a cold lead that hard.
Read the full email

From: roseperry0852@gmail.com · Redactions shown in black

[Author names],

You launched [Book title] as Amazon's #1 Hot New Release in [category] seven months ago. Today you're ranked #[rank] in the Kindle Store with [number] reviews. That's not a slow decline. That's a freefall.

You've got the writing chops. Readers who find you love the pacing, the dark humor, the conspiracy realism, the law enforcement authenticity. One reviewer said it "[review quote]." That's the reaction authors spend careers chasing.

But those readers aren't finding you anymore because the initial launch visibility window closed, and you have no system to sustain discovery.

Here's what's killing your series:

Your Book 1 readers aren't migrating to Book 2. After seven months, [number] reviews suggests either Book 1's audience was microscopic, or you're losing readers between books. For a two book series with strong Book 1 performance, Book 2 should see immediate carryover. That's not happening, which means there's a broken bridge in your reader journey.

You're positioned in five different subgenres and Amazon doesn't know where to place you. Medical thriller, political thriller, conspiracy, vigilante justice, action/humor hybrid. Readers searching for "conspiracy thrillers like Vince Flynn" find established names. Readers searching for "dark humor action like Deadpool" find different books entirely. You're not dominating any single discovery path, so you're invisible in all of them.

Your #1 Hot New Release moment gave you temporary visibility, not sustainable momentum. Hot New Release badges last 30 days, then disappear. You had a window where Amazon's algorithm surfaced you to thriller readers. That window closed, and without targeted advertising, email list building, or strategic series positioning, you vanished from recommendation engines. The momentum didn't die naturally. It was never built to last beyond launch month.

I'd love to help you with three focused strategies:

Series conversion architecture to transform your two book series into a reader retention system that captures Book 1 readers and drives them directly into Book 2. Strategic series page optimization, Book 1 to Book 2 bridge mechanisms (author's note CTAs, cliffhanger positioning, book end hooks), and bundle strategies that turn single book buyers into series completionists. Right now you're treating Book 1 and Book 2 as separate products. They should function as a unified reader journey with intentional hand-offs.

Subgenre dominance positioning to stop competing in five categories and own one. Your [book's themes] position you perfectly for the medical/conspiracy thriller crossover audience that devours Robin Cook, Michael Palmer, and Kathy Reichs. But you're not showing up in their "customers also bought" recommendations because your category positioning is scattered. We'd focus your Amazon categories, keywords, and comp titles to capture that specific audience and make you the obvious next read.

Paid traffic resurrection to rebuild discovery after your organic launch visibility died. Amazon Ads targeting readers of established conspiracy thriller authors (Brad Thor, Vince Flynn, Daniel Silva), Facebook retargeting campaigns focused on your [author background] and [book's angle], and BookBub Featured Deal submissions to reintroduce Book 1 to 500,000+ thriller readers. Your [x.x] star rating proves the book works when people find it. The problem is nobody's finding it anymore.

You didn't write two books with this much reader praise to watch them disappear at #[rank]. If this resonates, reply "interested" and I'll walk you through exactly how we'd rebuild [Book title]'s visibility and turn your series into a sustained income stream instead of a dead launch.

Respectfully,
Rose Perry
Book Marketing Strategist
Mary Brown Book Marketing
E. roseperry0852@gmail.com
W. roseperry0852-lab.github.io/Sarah-Perry/

Why it worksThis is one of the most convincing cases in the log because parts of the advice are real. Series read-through, tight categories and targeted ads do matter. That's the trick: accurate generic advice plus your real numbers sounds like expertise. Ask any marketer for a business address, a real website, and three past clients you can contact yourself. A fake identity can't produce those.
CASE #0092026 · Email · Same playbook as #008VERDICT: PAID PITCH, FAKE EXPERT

The "visibility strategist" with a branded diagnosis

Claims to be"Lucien Kade," a "Vigilante and Dark Crime Fiction Visibility Strategist"
Sent fromlucienkade01@gmail.com
The pitchA diagnosis of three "structural problems," more "in my notes," and an urgent window that's closing

The tells

  • A made-up framework with a capitalized name, "The Authority-Invisibility Gap." Branded jargon makes generic advice sound like proprietary insight.
  • A job title custom-fit to the target's genre. Write vigilante fiction and you get a vigilante fiction strategist. Write romance and "Lucien" would be a romance strategist.
  • Deep but public data: Amazon rank and category, review counts, Goodreads shelves, the author's website, even a past discount promo. Every bit of it is visible from the outside, and scraping it is automated.
  • Same bones as Case #008: Hot New Release badge, a "leaking" funnel between Book 1 and Book 2, and a countdown ("six months from now" the window closes).
  • "Additional observations in my notes." The cliffhanger is the hook. You reply to get the rest.
  • Ends on a soulful question about what the story means to you. Answer it and you're in a sales conversation.
  • Another numbered Gmail. No company, no website, no clients.
Read the full email

From: lucienkade01@gmail.com · Redactions shown in black

Hi [first name],

A man with law enforcement experience real enough to build [author's website] for crime writers has a book sitting on page [rank] of the Kindle Store. That is not a reader problem. That is a visibility architecture problem, and I want to be direct with you about what I am seeing.

My name is Lucien Kade. I study discoverability patterns for thriller and crime fiction authors, specifically the structural gaps between what a book deserves based on its quality signals and what the algorithm is actually delivering.

[Book title] has a [x.x] on Amazon across [number] reviews. Readers are calling it [review quotes]. That is not a book with a quality problem. That is a book with a positioning problem, and it has a name.

What I am looking at here is what I call The Authority-Invisibility Gap. It is a pattern I see consistently with authors who have built real-world credibility and community in adjacent spaces but whose book metadata and category architecture are not connecting that authority to the readers who would pay immediately for exactly what they are offering. The gap is not between you and your readers. It is between where Amazon has placed this book and where those readers are actually looking.

Here is what the data is showing me specifically.

1. The Category Ceiling

[Book title] is listed under [category], where it ranks at #[rank]. That sounds decent until you understand that [category] is one of the most saturated and misaligned categories for this book's actual reader. Your core reader is not looking for political assassination fiction. They are looking for dark, morally complex vigilante stories with humor woven into the violence, the reader who finished John Wick and wanted more, the reader who loved the Punisher's logic without the comic book framing. That reader lives in Vigilante Justice, in Dark Humor Thrillers, in Conspiracy Thrillers with a sardonic edge. Your current category placement is showing your book to the wrong audience and hiding it from the right one. That mismatch is costing you click-through every single day the book stays where it is.

2. The Series Momentum Disconnect

You have two books published. Book 2, [Book 2 title], debuted as an Amazon number one Hot New Release in [category]. That is a real result. But on Goodreads, [Book title] has [number] ratings and [number] people who want to read it. That want-to-read number should be three to four times higher minimum for a book with a live sequel already in the market. When the want-to-read shelf is thin, the algorithm treats the book as a low-interest title, which suppresses it in also-bought chains and recommendation feeds. Readers who finish Book 1 and go looking for Book 2 are not being captured by a warm Goodreads ecosystem that pulls new readers in behind them. The funnel between your two books is leaking.

3. The Platform-to-Book Conversion Problem

You built a tool specifically for crime writers. That is a community play, and it is a smart one. But crime writers are also crime readers, and that bridge between [author's website] and [Book title] is not being built in any systematic way that I can see from the outside. You have a natural authority position with exactly the audience that would champion this book, share it in their writing communities, and review it publicly. That community is not being activated around the book.

These three represent the most urgent structural problems in the data. There are additional observations in my notes beyond these three that speak to metadata specifics and search positioning, but the above is where the bleeding is happening fastest.

What you did with that [promo service] feature tells me you already know the book needs a push. A 99-cent promo gets reads. What it does not do is fix the underlying architecture that determines whether those reads compound into sustained ranking movement or disappear after the promotion ends. Without the structural work done first, every promo you run hits the same ceiling.

Here is what the timing looks like for you specifically. Book 2 is already live. That means you are in the window where cross-series visibility work has its highest return. The algorithm rewards series momentum when both books are showing activity signals simultaneously. Six months from now, Book 2 will have aged out of its new release window entirely, and the cost of rebuilding that momentum from a cold position is significantly higher than building correctly right now while the series still has heat.

The readers who [reader praise], those readers exist in numbers far beyond what [number] Amazon reviews and [number] Goodreads ratings are suggesting. The question I want to leave you with is this:

When you wrote [main character]'s story, what did you imagine it would mean for the readers who needed exactly that kind of justice, even fictional justice, in their hands?

Lucien Kade
Vigilante and Dark Crime Fiction Visibility Strategist
lucienkade01@gmail.com

The patternCases #008 and #009 are the new generation: AI-written audits built from scraped public data, personalized enough to feel like someone studied your book. The flattery is real numbers; the expert isn't. Same test applies: a real address, a real website, and past clients you can call.
CASE #007Sep 6, 2026 · EmailVERDICT: FREE-SAMPLE UPSELL

The "complimentary" spotlight banner

Claims to be"Tom Hogan" of Book Media Creative, offering trailers, graphics and book club features
Sent fromtombookmediacreative@gmail.com
The offerA free "Author Spotlight" banner, "no pressure or obligation"

The tells

  • "Author Spotlight" for the third time in this log (see Cases #003 and #005). Now it's a design service instead of a book club.
  • "Vigilante justice" shows up here and in Case #006's fake reader email. Same buzzwords, likely the same toolkit generating them.
  • A design "company" with no website, no portfolio link and a Gmail address.
  • Sent at 12:29 AM Pacific.
  • "You can see the sample first." The freebie is real; it exists to start the conversation that ends in a paid package.
What usually comes nextThe free banner arrives looking decent, often with your book cover dropped onto a template. Then comes the menu: trailers, ad sets, "book club placement," each with a price. See Case #011 for exactly how that menu looks.
CASE #004Sep 23, 2026 · EmailVERDICT: PROCEED WITH CAUTION

The year-long "literary residency"

Claims to be"Joseph" from The Reading Atelier, a "reader centered literary community"
Sent fromjoseph@thereadingsatelier.com
The pitchA "Year Book Impact Program" with trailers, reading guides, a podcast and a "Book Impact Hub"

The tells

  • It admits the source: "From the description of your book." Nobody read it. They read the listing.
  • Stray asterisks all over the email, like *Title* and **Program Name**. That's chatbot formatting pasted into an email without cleaning it up.
  • A big, branded menu of deliverables (five "stages," an "Impact Trailer," a "Cinematic Presentation") and not one word about who the readers are or how many.
  • No price anywhere. The "complete breakdown" comes after you say yes.
  • Your book "considered" for the program. Being "selected" is the hook; the invoice is the program.
Why it's differentThis one uses its own domain instead of Gmail, so it looks more established. That doesn't make it a real readership. Before paying anything, ask for the actual reader numbers, names of past authors you can contact, and the full price in writing. We couldn't find any public footprint for this program.
CASE #006Sep 21, 2026 · EmailVERDICT: SYMPATHY BAIT

"My blind daughter needs the audiobook"

Claims to beA fellow author, using the name of a real, published historical fantasy writer
Sent fromannaelliott.author@gmail.comSignature lists a second Gmail: annaelliottstories@gmail.com
The ask"Just a quick yes or no" on whether an audiobook exists

The tells

  • The audiobook exists and takes seconds to find. She "searched everywhere" and missed it.
  • Two different Gmail addresses in one email, sender and signature. Neither is the real author's.
  • Plot details lifted from the book description, plus phrasing no parent talks like: "Only you can share this vigilante justice."
  • A sick or disabled child, plus "a quick yes or no means everything." Guilt is the lever. Ignoring a blind kid feels awful, which is the point.
  • A stranger who writes historical fantasy, cold-emailing a thriller author about her family. Real readers rarely sign off with their own author credentials.
What's the angle?No money is asked for up front, and that's on purpose. Your reply confirms a live, responsive inbox and opens a friendly thread. From there the conversation tends to drift toward "help": audiobook production, accessibility marketing, or a promo service. If you want to be kind, reply with a public store link and nothing else. Real readers will find it.

The real author whose name is used here has nothing to do with this email.

CASE #013Oct 19 to 23, 2023 · X DMVERDICT: IMPOSSIBLE NUMBERS

We asked for testimonials. We got a discount.

Claims to be"Amy," a book promo service with 500+ authors promoted
Sent viaX direct message
The promise60,000 to 70,000 buy-link visits and a 10 to 15% click-to-buy rate on the bigger packages, around $100

The transcript

Left: themRight: us
Atleast 60,000- 70,000 buy link visits and a drastic increase in followers with package C and D.Oct 19
Click to buy percentage lies between 10-15%. So not only it will create large sales, it will drastically expand your social media appearance.Oct 19
Where do you place the ads? And do you have it broken out by genre'sOct 19
[link to instagram.com, the homepage]
The ads are on Instagram and Twitter. Our main promotional page is
Oct 19
We have promoted more than 500 authors of all genre. We use specific keywords and social media influencers according to the genre to get maximum reachOct 19
Do you have any testimonials from authors who have had a bump in sales after working with you.Oct 20
As it is your first promotion with us, I can offer you FLAT 50% OFF on all the packages.Oct 23 · 12:14 AM, three days later

The tells

  • Do the math. 60,000 visits at 10% is 6,000 sales, for about a hundred bucks. If that worked, every publisher on earth would be lined up.
  • Asked for proof, they answered with a price cut. When the evidence question gets a sales pitch, there is no evidence.
  • "Our main promotional page" was a link to Instagram's front door.
  • 500 authors promoted and not one name they could share.
The lessonProof questions are the best filter we've found. "Show me a past client I can contact." A legit service answers with names. A scam answers with urgency or a discount.
CASE #012Nov 14, 2023 · X DMVERDICT: UNVERIFIED PROMO BLAST

300,000 readers for $30, blue check included

Claims to be"Kindlebookpromotion," a book marketing team with 3,000 promotions behind it
Sent viaX direct message from a blue-check account, 1:10 AM Pacific, with an Upwork listing link
The offer$30 for a website post shared to "255,000 Facebook fans" and other big follower counts

The tells

  • The blue check proves nothing. On X it's a paid subscription, not a background check.
  • "3000 promotions" and "3000 5-star ratings." A perfect one-to-one match is a number someone typed, not a track record.
  • "Click on the link below." There was no link below. A copy-paste template that didn't survive the paste.
  • Follower counts in the hundreds of thousands, but no website name you can look up first. Same problem as Case #010: big audiences that never seem to like anything.
  • Pushes you to an outside gig listing to pay, so the account itself never handles the money.
The real costAt $30 this isn't a big con. It's a blast to followers who probably aren't real readers. The loss is small, but so is the result. Our reply asked for a website and a LinkedIn profile. That's the right move: anyone running a real promo business can send both in seconds.
CASE #010Apr 27, 2026 · X DMVERDICT: PAID REVIEWS, RISKS YOUR ACCOUNT

The review price list in your DMs

Claims to be"Pratibha," a book reviewer with big followings on Instagram, Facebook, X and LinkedIn
Sent viaDirect message on X, 12:36 AM Pacific
The menu$5 to $20 per platform, including Amazon, Goodreads and Barnes & Noble reviews, book cost extra

The tells

  • Huge follower counts, dead accounts. Check the profiles: posts with tens of thousands of followers and almost no likes or comments means bought followers. Nobody's reading those reviews.
  • "My audience is organic and my reviews are genuine." Real reviewers don't need to say that up front.
  • A cold DM from someone you've never interacted with, with no mention of your book. Same message goes to every author.
  • "Barnes and Nobles." Small thing, but a pro would know the name of the store they review on.
The real dangerThis one is upfront about money, so it's less of a con than the others. But paying for Amazon or Goodreads reviews breaks their rules. Best case, the reviews get removed. Worst case, your book or author account gets flagged. You'd be paying to put your own listing at risk.
CASE #0142026 · X DMVERDICT: AUTHOR IMPERSONATION, LONG CON

The bestselling author who wants to be your friend

Claims to beA real, bestselling contemporary romance author with dozens of published books
Sent viaX direct message, right after a follow
The askNothing yet. Just friendly questions about your writing journey.

The tells

  • A big-name author personally DMing a stranger after a follow. We asked how she even has time. The answer was warm, and empty.
  • Her bio facts (book count, genre, coffee-and-no-sleep jokes) are all lifted from the real author's public profile.
  • Open-ended questions about you: your most rewarding moment, how many books you've written. It feels like interest. It's qualification: how far along you are, how invested, how likely to spend.
  • Replies within minutes, every time, on a Sunday. Real bestsellers with deadlines don't run a chat service.
  • Check the account itself: recent creation date, few posts, small follower count compared to the real author's verified profile.
Where it endsSlowly. In a similar thread we strung along for about a year, a fake bestselling indie author eventually got around to the point: we should hire "her" marketing person. The friendship is the setup. The referral is the sale, and the impersonator gets a cut.

The real author whose name is used here has nothing to do with these messages. Famous authors are impersonated constantly; check for their official, linked accounts from their own website.

CASE #016Oct 18 to 21, 2026 · X DMVERDICT: CRYPTO SCAM · ACCOUNT SUSPENDED

The famous doctor who remembered a psychic tuna

Claims to beA well-known doctor and media personality with a large online following
Sent viaX direct message from a blue-check account that joined September 2025, with 20.8K followers
The opener"Hey patriot, how long have you been following?"

The tells

  • The real person has been online for well over a decade. This account is about a year old.
  • Twenty thousand followers and a blue check. Neither proves identity: the check is bought, and followers pile up on any account wearing a famous face.
  • "Hey patriot." The greeting is tuned to the audience they think you're in. Change the celebrity and the word changes.
  • "How long have you been following?" Same move as Case #014: measuring how loyal and how reachable you are.
  • She "remembered" a radio show and an episode that never existed.
  • The reply came at 3:39 AM Pacific, and went straight from "thank you for standing by truths" to "banks and stock markets are crashing in a few weeks." Two messages from hello to financial panic.

The transcript

Left: themRight: us
Hey patriot, how long have you been following, I hope you're enjoying my videos and contents so far.Sun, Oct 18
OMG is this really you?? I've followed you since 2009, back when you had the radio show with the guy who did the weather on the boat. Do you remember the episode about the sentient psychic Tuna?Mon, Oct 19 · none of this ever happened
Yes, that's me. I do remember. You're welcome patriot, thank you for standing by truths, hope you're aware that banks and exchanges/ stock markets are crashing down in few weeks?Wed, Oct 21 · 3:39 AM
Yes I'm aware, that's why I've been looking at moving my savings. I was thinking silver. Do you have any insider information? I know you are the tip of the spear.Oct 21 · 11:04 AM
The real storm is in 8 weeks. I have reliable intel that provides me with the latest news and insights on what's happening and what's about to unfold. This appears to be a planned event by the black hats to gain control of our finances and impose mandatory terms on us..Oct 21 · 12:10 PM
In few weeks after the bank crash, cash would become useless and outdated. The Quantum Financial System (QFS) would be a groundbreaking innovation in banking, ushering in a new era. Unlike traditional banking, QFS won't be influenced by government policies. Instead, it'll be fully backed by tangible metal-backed assets like ISO tokens XLM and XRP. Are you holding any of these?Oct 21 · 12:18 PM · the pitch
This account is suspended from using X ChatSame afternoon
Try this: the fake memory testAsk about something that never happened. A real person says "what?" An impostor working a script says "of course!" This one confirmed the psychic tuna episode and then went right for the pitch.
What "QFS" really isThe "Quantum Financial System" doesn't exist. It's a long-running scam story: the banks are about to collapse, cash will be worthless, and the only safe place for your money is certain crypto tokens. The next step is always a "wallet," "advisor" or "secure platform" where you send your savings, and it's gone. Notice the order: fear (the crash), a secret (insider intel), a deadline (8 weeks), then the product. No real doctor, celebrity or financial expert will ever DM you to move your money.
How it endedFour messages from "hey patriot" to crypto. Then X suspended the account the same afternoon. The operator is almost certainly back under a new famous face already.

Not a book scam, but it's the same playbook authors get from fake bestsellers. The real person named on this account is not involved.

CASE #017Feb 1, 2026 · X DMSTATUS: ACCOUNT SUSPENDED

"This is the mother of a famous billionaire"

Claims to beThe mother of a famous tech billionaire, herself a well-known public figure
Sent viaX direct message at 4:51 AM Pacific, from an account dated January 2012
The opener"Are you a supporter or admirer of my son's work?"

The tells

  • "Good day, dear." A stock scam greeting that shows up in fake celebrity messages everywhere.
  • She introduces herself by her son. The famous name is the bait, not her.
  • "Supporter or admirer" is a loyalty check. Say yes and the next steps are usually an "exclusive" investment, a crypto giveaway, or a paid fan membership.
  • An account from 2012 looks established. Scammers buy or hijack old accounts for exactly that reason, then rename them. The "safety number has changed" notice two weeks later means the account changed hands or devices.
How it endedX suspended the account. That's how most of these end, but only after they've worked the inbox. A suspension doesn't refund anyone who already paid, and the same operator is usually back under a new name within days.

The real person named on this account is not involved.

CASE #0152026 · X DMVERDICT: RECOVERY SCAM

The scammer who offers to catch your scammer

Claims to be"June Anderson," a former scam victim turned "safety advocate" who helps trace scammers
Sent viaX direct message from @JuneAnderson756
The pitch"Have you been a victim of a scam?" Pinned post: "Lets help you recover your money"

The tells

  • Joined X in September 2026 and "changed their username recently." A fresh account wearing a new name.
  • Following 4,566, followed by 107, with 18 posts. Mass-following to fish for DMs.
  • A handle with a number tacked on and a glamour headshot. Classic borrowed-face profile.
  • Cold-DMs strangers asking if they've been scammed. Real victim advocates don't go door to door.
  • A checklist graphic of every scam type they can "recover" from. Nobody can promise that.
How it worksRecovery scams target people who already lost money, because they're hurting and want it back. The "recovery" comes with an upfront fee, a "tracing" charge, or a request for your bank or crypto login. Then they vanish too. If you've been scammed, report it directly: in the U.S., the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov and the FBI at ic3.gov. Both are free.

Heads up: pages like this one attract these accounts. Scam Watch will never DM you first, never charge you, and never offer to get your money back.

CASE #018Apr 15 to 16, 2025 · X DMSTATUS: THEY BLOCKED US

"Are you a robot?" Blocked.

Claims to be"Anne Kayla," a friendly artist who posts lifestyle photos and paintings
Sent viaX direct message from @Anne17822
The openerA chatty comment about a family member, pulled from our own public posts

How it played out

  1. The hook. A casual, oddly familiar message referencing something personal we'd posted about, as if we'd been chatting for weeks.
  2. We answered with something real and sad.
  3. The script reset. Hours later: "Nice to meet you on X, I'm glad you follow me! A new day has begun, full of energy!" Then, tacked on the end, "I'm so sorry I didn't know this happened." Two scripts colliding.
  4. We sent a GIF: "Are you a robot?"
  5. Blocked.

The tells

  • Opens mid-conversation about your personal life. Scammers scroll your posts first and use what they find to feel familiar.
  • Ignored what we actually said, then pasted in a cheerful "nice to meet you" message. The sympathy line came after, like someone noticed late.
  • Attractive profile, glamour shots, "many people don't believe I can draw." Built to start conversations, not to be an artist.
  • Folded instantly when asked if they were real.
Where these goAccounts like this usually run a slow friendship or romance script, and weeks later introduce a "can't-miss" investment, often crypto. We never got that far. Turns out one GIF is a faster test than the fake memory trick.

Profile photos on accounts like this are usually stolen from real people, so we don't show them here.

CASE #019Oct 26 to Dec 2024 · X DMVERDICT: BOT FARM, ROMANCE TO JOB SCAM

Twelve "friends," one bot, six weeks of us messing with it

Claims to beA woman "new to the United States" who keeps wanting to introduce you to her single friends
Sent viaX direct message from "Liotheighth," an account that joined August 2024
The goalGet you off X and onto Telegram or WhatsApp, where nobody's moderating

Highlights from the transcript

Left: themRight: us
Hi, I find your profile interesting. I think we can be friends. I like music and traveling. I am looking for male friends over 35 years old living in the United States. This is my Telegram ID: Mochi8977Oct 26
My best friend wants me to introduce her to a mature man... I thought of you first. You may have a spark of love. Telegram and add her ID: aimeili666Nov 11
I am a very huge author and well know amongst my loyal fans. Here is a photo of me on the cover of my best selling book. Do you think your friend will like to share a toilet with me?Nov 15 · sent with a parody book cover
Sorry, I don't check Twitter often. My usual Telegram ID is this: Spike8877Nov 18
Neither do I. But I don't do telegram because I keep getting hacked.!Nov 18
Sorry, I don't check Twitter often. My usual Telegram ID is this: Spike8877Nov 18 · the exact same message, again
Dear, my friend wants me to introduce her to a gentleman. She is sexy and cheerful, likes drinking and sports.Nov 20
I don't drink and I don't like sports. Does she like ATM?Nov 20
Can you add her in Telegram and recommend your city to her? Her Telegram ID is: x93668Nov 21
Sure I just did. Tell her to look for my handle: BigDaddy007Nov 21
Are you there? My friend is currently working in a human resources recruitment company. Her name is Valentina. She has a remote online job... It only takes 1-2 hours a day. The salary is 50-500 US dollars.Nov 23 · the pivot
Sure. I just added that telegram. I'm awaiting further instructions from Valentina.Nov 23
My friend wants to meet an American man, will it be you? If you are willing, you can add her on WhatsApp.Nov 25 · and on, and on, into December

The tells

  • It never reads a word you write. Jokes, refusals, insults: the next message is always another "friend" with another Telegram ID.
  • Twelve different Telegram IDs and two WhatsApp numbers in six weeks: Mochi8977, Nt00451, aimeili666, chi759, Misaki_Satou, Spike8877, DDD1313213, x93668, VV78714, Lin6481, irene_Z16, qq44147. That's not a person, it's a rotation.
  • Every message pushes you to another app. Off X, there's no report button and no moderation.
  • The "friend" keeps changing: best friend, colleague, neighbor, neighbor's sister, coworker, Japanese tourist. The one constant is "American man."
  • Midway through, the romance script swaps to a remote job offer. Same bot, new bait.
Where these goTwo well-known endings. The romance route builds trust for weeks, then introduces a crypto "investment" that drains your savings. The "Valentina" route is a task scam: easy online work that pays a little at first, then requires you to deposit your own money to "unlock" earnings. Either way, the first step is always the same: leave the platform.

We've left out the phone numbers, since scam operations often use recycled or spoofed numbers that later belong to innocent people. The rest of our replies were not fit for a family website.

Six tells that hold up every time

01

They never name your book

Someone who actually read it will mention it. Vague praise is a template. And if they do name it, check whether every detail came from the public description.

02

Free email, big name

Networks, studios, stations and agencies write from their own domains. Gmail plus a famous title is a red flag.

03

The money shows up on message two

The first message is all flattery. The fee, the package, or the "partner agency" arrives after you bite.

04

They ask you to do the talking

"Tell us what you'd like to highlight" or "would you be open to the details?" gets you invested and replying, which is all they want.

05

Verify through the front door

Look up the outlet, club or company yourself and contact them there. Never use the phone number or link in the message.

06

Famous people don't slide into your DMs

A celebrity, bestselling author or big-name expert messaging you first is fake until proven otherwise. Find their official account through their own website. Impostors can rack up huge followings, so a big follower count proves nothing.

Got one?

File a report.

Paste in what landed in your inbox or DMs and attach screenshots if you have them. We review every report, strip out personal info, and add the confirmed ones to the log so the next author sees it coming.

We read everything, but we can't reply to every report or promise every one gets published.

We will never DM you first, never charge for anything on this page, and never offer to recover lost money. Anyone claiming to be us who does is not us.

Already lost money? Report it to the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov and the FBI at ic3.gov.

Only used if we have a question about your report. Never published.
Up to 3 images, 8 MB total.